COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
NEEDS
The BioProtect Marine Planner supports case-specific and area-based conservation solutions by following collaborative processes. The tool collects and analyses local challenges through formal and informal spatial data and generates solutions tailored to the chosen scale for the planning process. It also facilitates dialogues between decision-makers and communities by simplifying the showcase of planning scenarios and updating the latter directly with stakeholders.
In Ireland, Norway, and other use-cases adopting the BioProtect Marine Planner, conservation implementation has been slow due to the complexity of harmonizing the data to create coherent plan, and due to the difficulty to effectively dialogue with communities on concrete actions. The tool fully bridges the above challenges, ensuring conservation is community-informed.
Engagement measures include open meetings, volunteer workdays, partnerships with local groups, regular communication, recognition of contributions, and inclusive forums for feedback and co-design.
Communities benefit from increased environmental knowledge, stronger social networks, enhanced wellbeing, new skills, and a shared sense of ownership over restored natural spaces.
MEASURES
- Demonstration workshops at the five BioProtect sites with local marine authorities, fishers, and NGOs to gather feedback on tool suitability and clarity
- Communities of Practice (CoPs) established within BioProtect to gather ongoing user feedback and ensure the tool reflects real stakeholder needs;
- Integration of PPGIS (Public Participation GIS) outputs from the broader BioProtect platform into the Marine Planner datasets.
- Capacity-building workshop to train end-users in adopting the tool for their planning project/scale
BENEFITS
Communities will benefit from: (1) greater transparency in conservation planning decisions that affect their livelihoods and marine access; (2) a formal mechanism to contribute local ecological knowledge into spatial planning, giving their input scientific and policy visibility; (3) improved marine governance outcomes, as plans based on integrated local and scientific knowledge are more likely to be effective and supported by communities; (4) access to a free, open web tool that empowers local managers and authorities to conduct their own preliminary conservation planning analyses.